Monday, January 7, 2019

BILA SATU BINI LIMA ANAK


Tuesday, January 8, 2019

BILA SATU BINI LIMA ANAK



KARACHI: Pakistan Medical Association (PMA) said 15,000 new babies on Jan 1st


increase of over five million a year

not good omen for a country with miserably limited resources to run itself


demanded govt to formulate an effective policy to control population


rapid increase of population in Pakistan

15,000 babies in Pakistan on Jan 1 is alarming sign


450,000 births in a month and 5.4 million in a year

Pakistan among fastest population growth in the world


Pakistan population more than 200 million people

it would be fourth most populous nation in world


60% of population below 25 years

25 million children not going to school

90% population not provided with clean drinking water

Malnutrition big issue, food scarcity grave problem


unchecked rise in population is looming disaster


increasing population increasing health burden on country 


healthcare infrastructure deteriorated with passage of time

greater dangers due to a rapidly increasing population


only 3 public hospitals in Karachi decades ago when population 3.5 m 

now 25m people, not a single new hospital

the existing ones’ delivery system deteriorated


water was not enough

supply lines weakened 

sanitation system gone down


no schools for children whose number is on the rise

housing problem getting worse 

no transport system for a mega city of this size 

Same apply to rest of the country 


Published in Dawn, January 7th, 2019



My comments : Well that is Pakistan. Too many babies being manufactured. 



I dont think Malaysia will ever have an ageing population. It is really wonderful to see so many kids running around. We see children everywhere.


But in Semenanjung Malaysia it is always differentiated by race, race, race. 


We see plenty of Malay kids, fewer Chinese kids and much less Indian kids.


The Chinese and many Indians have fewer children for a few reasons.  


The mom and dad must really have the time, energy and money to spend on children. So they think and plan carefully. 


The money part is important. 

Children take up a lot of money resources.  

Plus time and energy.


The Chinese and Indians are going for quality over quantity.  

Many Chinese and Indians opt for 'nuclear families' - two kids, maybe three.


So the parents can spend more time, more energy, more money, more resources to be spread over just two or three children.  Their children will also have better clothes, better tuition, involvement in hobbies, travel opportunities, activities etc which will all add up to their growing up as better persons.


Dr Muhd Khalid the economic advisor to the PM says that the average Chinese (or non Malay) child also inherits a minimum RM750,000 in assets from his or her parents. This is usually in the form of  the family house or apartment.  I think with property values increasing this inherited figure could go even higher. 



Meaning  many of  the  non Malay kids are already millionaires through inheritance. 


Of course if there are five kids or seven kids, then they will get less. 


We have two boys of our own. From early on we decided to let the boys travel. In their earlier years we took them all over the country - from Perlis to Sabah. Then later we took them to quite a few foreign countries.  While still studying, the boys also began travelling on their own to other countries in Europe, Australia and Asia. We thought of it as an investment in their future.  Travelling to other countries and observing other people has certainly widened their horizons. 


We were able to afford all this because we only had two kids of our own. If we had had four kids or five kids I dont think we could have afforded to  send them overseas as much.


It is no rocket science. The more kids you have the lesser they will get from you.


The more kids you have they will have to compete for your attention, for your money, for your time, for educational resources, clothes, toys and for everything.


In the modern, urban environment  kids must have maximum resource investment by their parents.  


In this regard there is another disaster going on among the Malays.  

There is still a population explosion among the Malays. 


This is actually quite serious and you folks are not paying enough attention to it.  Some will say 'It does not involve me'.  Well you are wrong. It does involve you.


The sekolah tahfiz are mushrooming.  Why?  They have actually become pusat pembuangan anak. Parents with too many kids, with no time to take care of kids are sending their kids to sekolah tahfiz.   They are cheap. For less than two hundred Ringgits a month, people can 'abandon' their kids in the care of these sekolah tahfiz.  Packed 40 to a room, eating whatever food they set on the table  [or floating in the dulang]  and left to the care of some dont-know-what-type of characters to teach and mould their kids.  


This is a relatively new phenomenon in Malaysia.

Another disaster in the making for the Malays.


Chinese and Indians do not have sekolah tahfiz - thanks be to all their gods. 


In Pantai Dalam where we have our business today and where we lived (more than 20 years ago) or owned apartments and been generally  present there since 1998, what our friendly Policemen shared with us 20 years ago has not changed.  


There are too many  children per household.  And when they are crammed inside those tiny low cost flats with only two or three rooms - then you have all sorts of sick stuff going on. 


Domestic violence,  gang behaviour, drugs, incest and all the other gejala happen not just because they are lower income but because there are too many kids per household.  


During the recent school break, young boys and girls on motorbikes were zooming up and down the new highway intersection that has at last opened. 


(By the way the new Pantai Sentral Intersection opened within TWO WEEKS after this blog highlighted the delays in the opening date. And I was correct - they were waiting for the Minister to officiate. The Deputy Minister of Works came to 'rasmikan' the new intersection. The power of the blogs again.) 


The kids have nowhere else to go. Certainly their parents had no means of sending them for two weeks in London and Paris - which would have given them a lifetime of memories.  Instead they were making a nuisance of themselves on the highway junction and showing the middle finger at anyone who hooted at them to get out of the way. 


Now we have made our home somewhere near  Bangi the 'bandar rahmatan lil alamin'.  This is a solidly middle class Malay neighborhood. Most of the people are civil servants with fixed incomes.  


They still have minimum four kids per couple.  

Even for two income families four kids cost a lot more money.


Overseas travel for the kids may not be possible.

Sekolah tahfiz at say RM350 per kid per month is more plausible.


This is what I see folks. 

Just more disasters in the making. 


Conclusion:  


A young Red Indian boy was talking to his father. He was asking his father why do Red Indians have really cool names like Running Deer, Two Feathers, Sitting Bull and stuff.  The father explained that it was Indian custom to name their children after events that happened when the child was conceived. Then father ended his explanation by asking his son 'Why do you ask Broken Rubber'?


Herein lies a message. Just like Pakistan, we need serious birth control.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is a 'HINDU' ?

In 1995, Chief Justice P. B. Gajendragadkarwas quoted in anIndian Supreme Court ruling:

When we think of the Hindu religion, unlike other religions in the world, the Hindu religion does not claim any one prophet; it does not worship any one god; it does not subscribe to any one dogma; it does not believe in any one philosophic concept; it does not follow any one set of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not appear to satisfy the narrow traditional features of any religion orcreed. It may broadly be described as away of life and nothing more.

Common Misunderstandings on Hinduism

Vedanta (and all Hinduism) is entirely monistic, believing only in the all-pervading world-soul, Brahman, rather than a personal God

This advaita philosophy is certainly popular, and offers a simple explanation of the many deities. Nonetheless, many theologians have considered God to be a person. He is not merely an anthropomorphic representation, nor are the various deities and murtis simply incarnations or representations of an impersonal Supreme.

Thus Hinduism includes both monism and monotheism. It is misleading to call the Abrahamic religions,"the monotheistic traditions," implying that monotheism is absent from the Eastern traditions. Vedanta includes many monotheistic schools. They may accept the existence of many gods and goddesses, but strongly emphasizes the pre-eminence of the Supreme Deity.



Previous writing links here:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Quotable Qoutes

We are all apt to believe what the world believes about us.
(George Eliot -1819 - 1880)


We are the people our parents warned us about.
(Jimmy Buffet)
"The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in times of great moral crisis maintain their neutrality."

(Dante Alighieri )





Blog Archive