Wednesday, June 5, 2013

From a previous post in 2007



 In conversation with regards to:  Fate versus free will

By Gunabalan -2007

There is this wonderful problem in our modern life of fate versusfree will. In almost any discussion on the metaphysics of life, I’ve encountered this yard stick by which the whole conversation gravitates around/on.
I’ve concluded and thus actually have arrived at an answer to this, which I will briefly outline. I found the answer in one of the Stobaeus fragments of the Corpus Hermeticum, in which Hermes is talking to his disciple Tat, as the name is usually transliterated.

Tat asks: “Tell me again about fateprovidence and necessity”. And Hermes after much intermediate material ends up with the statement along the lines of, “Fate concerns the body, necessity concerns that part of the mind that works only with the body, and providence is concerned with the mind that is fully conscious of the body.” What is made clear in this statement (by my humble interpretation!) is that there is no one such thing as fate.

There is a fate that is due to our being material beings of a certain species. No matter how hard you try, no amount of free will ever converts you to a dog or a cat in this life time.

You cannot fly without a plane – unless (perhaps) you are a certain kind of Vedic meditator – you cannot walk through walls without a door, you cannot see through walls without a window, you are limited by natural law. That is the fundamental meaning of fate in ancient Greek philosophy. It is physical law.

At this juncture we shall depart to modern metaphysics; whereby, there is the fate due to ignorance, called necessity.We get ourselves caught up in situations where we simply cannot conceive of an alternative, because we have all these considerations about what must be so and what must not be so, and we are determined by the consequences of past decisions and current actions.(both numerated and perceived)

That is most of what our fate consists of- to those of this ilk. It has nothing to do with the fate!

And then, finally, there is the other fate that is absolutely irrevocable, called providence.

You have no choice but to be who you are. In the Bhagavad-Gita, Krishna enumerates Arjuna on this: Your choice is to be who you are at the highest possible level or you choose not. (Cue Master Yoda!)

And I would go so far as to say that who you really are preexists who you are at the present moment, and it is pulling you forward to itself/your real self, and that pull is inevitable. This is also aptly described by old Asian folklore that relates how one should not confuse anger at another with fate because their action is part of their character.........


(the story of the frog and the scorpion, relates how both animals need to cross the river and the scorpion needed the frog’s help in crossing though the frog is against the idea knowing the scorpion will sting him but in the end the frog pities the scorpion and does carry him across only to be stung mid-stream and when questioned why,the scorpion says it was nothing personal, just his natural instinct kicking in and both animals then drown. )

Your getting all the way here, becoming a fully realized human being, is not inevitable- ie you choose to through your own Free Will.

Circumstances, accidents and of course the ever-present stupidity, or unconsciousness – whatever you want to call it – will all in varying degrees prevent us from getting to that perfect self-realization.
This is one of the things the old writings have taught us, but the modern living as we know it, makes the practice of what we know so much harder!..

As such, the Free Will dogma flown high by many is in retrospect nothing more than their karma catching up with themin addition to their choices made in each life.

To end , I would like to quote the Gita once again, Pages 626-Chapter 12-text 12:
Sreyo hi jnanam abhyasad
Jnanad dhyanam visisyate
Dhyanat karma –phala-tyagas
Tyagac chantir anantaram

Translation: If you cannot take to this practice,*(constantly thinking of God) then engage yourself in the cultivation of knowledge. Better than knowledge, however, is meditation, and better than meditation is renunciation of the fruits of action, for by such renunciation one can attain real peace of mind.

FINIS

*My personal addendum, not in scripture

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is a 'HINDU' ?

In 1995, Chief Justice P. B. Gajendragadkarwas quoted in anIndian Supreme Court ruling:

When we think of the Hindu religion, unlike other religions in the world, the Hindu religion does not claim any one prophet; it does not worship any one god; it does not subscribe to any one dogma; it does not believe in any one philosophic concept; it does not follow any one set of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not appear to satisfy the narrow traditional features of any religion orcreed. It may broadly be described as away of life and nothing more.

Common Misunderstandings on Hinduism

Vedanta (and all Hinduism) is entirely monistic, believing only in the all-pervading world-soul, Brahman, rather than a personal God

This advaita philosophy is certainly popular, and offers a simple explanation of the many deities. Nonetheless, many theologians have considered God to be a person. He is not merely an anthropomorphic representation, nor are the various deities and murtis simply incarnations or representations of an impersonal Supreme.

Thus Hinduism includes both monism and monotheism. It is misleading to call the Abrahamic religions,"the monotheistic traditions," implying that monotheism is absent from the Eastern traditions. Vedanta includes many monotheistic schools. They may accept the existence of many gods and goddesses, but strongly emphasizes the pre-eminence of the Supreme Deity.



Previous writing links here:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Quotable Qoutes

We are all apt to believe what the world believes about us.
(George Eliot -1819 - 1880)


We are the people our parents warned us about.
(Jimmy Buffet)
"The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in times of great moral crisis maintain their neutrality."

(Dante Alighieri )





Blog Archive